Advances in Diabetes & Endocrinology

Research Article

Clinician Perspectives on Cardiovascular Risk–Based Use of DPP-4 and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Indian Settings

Manjula S* and Krishna Kumar M

Department of Medical Services, Micro Labs Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
*Address for Correspondence:Dr Manjula S, Department of Medical Services, Micro Labs Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka. E-mail Id: drmanjulas@gmail.com
Submission: 16 April, 2026 Accepted: 06 May, 2026 Published: 08 May, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Manjula S, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords:Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Cardiovascular risk; Glycemic variability; DPP-4 inhibitors; SGLT2 inhibitors; Sitagliptin; Dapagliflozin

Abstract

Objective: The survey aimed to assess clinicians’ perspectives and preferences in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with particular emphasis on cardiovascular risk–based decision-making and the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in routine clinical practice. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted among clinicians across India to assess clinical perspectives in the management of T2DM with cardiovascular risk, heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A structured 22-item, multiple-response questionnaire was distributed via digital platforms, and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize clinician preferences and experiences.
Results: A total of 366 clinicians participated in the survey. Nearly 34% of clinicians identified the combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor, an SGLT2 inhibitor, and metformin as their preferred initiation therapy for newly diagnosed individuals with T2DM and cardiovascular risk. Approximately 80% of respondents reported sitagliptin as their preferred DPP-4 inhibitor. Around 70% of clinicians favored switching to a triple combination of metformin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, and an SGLT2 inhibitor in patients inadequately controlled on sulphonylurea plus metformin therapy. Among newly diagnosed individuals with T2DM and HF, 49% preferred the combination of a DPP-4 inhibitor, an SGLT2 inhibitor, and metformin as the oral antidiabetic regimen. Nearly 86% of participants favored dapagliflozin as the preferred SGLT2 inhibitor in patients with established HF.
Conclusion: This survey indicates that clinicians frequently encounter individuals with T2DM presenting with cardiovascular risk. Physicians predominantly favor combination regimens incorporating DPP-4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors due to their perceived benefits in achieving glycemic targets, reducing glycemic variability, and providing cardiovascular and renal protection.