Journal of Urology & Nephrology
The Therapeutic Ladder - A Clinician and a Patient Perspective
Bothmann T, Daniels-Hepnar V*, Kurek A andPerelman J
Director Clinical Education, Vaughan Medical LLC, USA
*Address for Correspondence: Daniels-Hepnar V, Director Clinical Education, Vaughan Medical LLC; USA; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Submission: 03 November, 2021 Accepted: 04 December, 2021 Published: 10 December, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Bothmann T, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Introduction: The therapeutic ladder has been well described in literature by many organizations over many years but rarely is the point of entry and the number of steps for the patient examined. It is reported anecdotally that the millennial would rather have a shortened therapeutic ladder.
Materials and Methods: A review of therapeutic ladders across the disease areas of pain management, acne vulgaris, Erectile Dysfunction and benign prostatic hyperplasia and original research of a qualitative phone interview of 24 dermatologists in the UK and Germany.
Results: A shortened therapeutic ladder will create benefits for the patient who wants to return to normal daily activity as soon as possible disease free and it will help in their mental health and quality of life at the same time potentially saving healthcare costs in both time and treatments and probably help the wider economy
Conclusion: Further research is needed into the wider healthcare economics of changing the way we address the therapeutic ladder. Shortening the patient pathway may give great benefits to the healthcare systems, healthcare funders, the wider economy and the patients overall long-term health outcomes.
The therapeutic ladder has been well described in literature by many organizations over many years but rarely is the point of entry and the number of steps for the patient examined and often at each step the patient has a cost and a visit to a health care professional incurring a cost in time and money and potentially a prescription cost . In socialized health care settings there is also a cost to the health care provider.
Therefore it is important that the entry point of the patient is examined in the clinical treatment pathway as well as the patient’s expectations and potential outcomes. It is interesting to note that patient entry points may depend upon outside social economic and demographic factors .
It is reported anecdotally that the millennial would rather enter the therapeutic ladder and have a treatment with a high degree of efficacy and effectiveness despite increased severity of treatment than follow the steps up the ladder.
Often the patient pathway map or therapeutic ladder has ‘failed to achieve’ and so to the next step or the patient can step off the ladder at any step as they are asymptomatic at that point .
For the health care provider the rational behind the therapeutic ladder and decision making pathway has often been that if the first line treatment is efficacious and effective in a % of patients that percentage will not go on to require the next step and so on reserving the most effective but often aggressive and therefore often more expensive treatment for the most severely affected patients.
The question is if this is fair and equitable to the patient with the disease ?
As more and more treatments are available OTC – Over The Counter often times patients have tried a wide variety of treatment options prior to attending a health care professional and with the internet, along with being well informed are often ill informed and have tried a wide variety of ‘alternative’ and often un-regulated treatments so the patients therapeutic ladder or pathway is often already tall and steep prior to accessing primary or secondary healthcare.
The World Health Organization describe the analgesic ladder as “A framework for treatment …”.
We can look at a therapeutic ladder for any disease or dis-ease across any area or speciality, acute or non-acute, and map the journey of the patient as they navigate the healthcare system and the number of touch points with healthcare professionals. In dermatology the therapeutic ladder usually starts with a topical therapy and then proceeds to a systemic therapy .
However the patients therapeutic ladder may well have started with a topical therapy or more than one OTC, Over The Counter preparations. Generally speaking, one considers using a systemic therapy for the management of a dermatological disorder when a disease entity confined to the skin fails to respond to topical therapy, topical therapy is not tolerated by the patient or is impractical given the extent of cutaneous involvement, the skin disease has associated internal organ involvement that cannot be treated with topical therapy alone, or the skin disease alone may potentially lead to significant morbidity and / or mortality if left untreated [6-10]. Little mention is made directly or indirectly in published literature to the patient preference for Quality of Life reasons to escalating treatment choices up the ladder to a more efficacious treatment option. Also there is little discussion made of the mental health issues caused to a patient by a disease but not directly related to the disease [11-16].
In the case of Acne, we know Acne is associated with depression and anxiety. Suicide is positively associated with acne and Acne may significantly increase suicide risk. However, the relationship between acne and suicide is still unclear[17-18]. Acne can affect facial appearance and lead to mental health problems, such as depression, anxiety and suicide [19-24]. One study results showed that acne was positively associated with suicide. Some previous literature has also indicated that acne is associated with major depression and suicide [25,26]. In addition, the study by Halvorsen and colleagues revealed that acne is associated with social and psychological problems . Adverse events, including suicidal ideation and depression, which have been associated with therapies for acne, may reflect the burden of substantial acne rather than the effects of medication. In America, the suicide rate is 10.8 per 100,000 persons, and suicide is the 11th leading cause of death, accounting for 1.4% of all US deaths. In total, 9%–15% of US dermatology patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and acne are at risk of suicide. In summary, a meta-analysis demonstrates that acne may significantly increase suicide risk. Clinicians should actively treat acne and consider suicide screening. Further international studies with high-quality analyses are needed as more data is published .
It therefore stands to reason that the patient is treated as efficaciously as possible and in the shortest time frame as the risk of adverse mental health over and directly related to their condition continues and increases over time especially if repeating treatments that are not providing clinical or perceptive improvement. This is the same for all conditions.
We chose to look at 3 potential therapeutic ladders for 3 different and disparate diseases affecting different percentages of the population but predominately in the male population • Acne • Erectile Dysfunction • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Acne is estimated to affect 9.4% of the global population, making it the eighth most prevalent disease worldwide. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that acne is most common in post pubescent teens, with boys most frequently affected particularly with more severe forms of the disease . Acne Affects between 40 million and 50 million individuals in the United States. Although acne mainly affects adolescents, it is also present in children and adults. One study found some degree of facial acne in 54% of women and 40% of men older than 25 years [30-35]. Erectile dysfunction (ED) represents an increasing health concern causing significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of men globally. It is estimated that 322 million men worldwide will be affected by ED by 2025, an increase from 152 million men in 1995 . Erectile dysfunction is a common medical problem affecting approximately 15% of men each year . Severe erectile dysfunction is an independent predictor of poor quality of life and not an indicator for comorbid diseases [41-46]. Erectile dysfunction may have a physiological or psychological basis, but the most common cause is thought to be related to vascular abnormalities of the penile blood supply and erectile tissue often associated with cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors [47-50]. The prevalence of erectile dysfunction varies widely in studies from different countries. It was estimated to be 18.4% in men aged ≥ 20 years in the United States , 49.4% in Canada  and 63.6% in Hong Kong . In a study in Qatar the prevalence of erectile dysfunction among Qatari patients was 66.2% among hypertensive patients and 23.8% among non-hypertensive controls [54,55]. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia BPH is a common problem that affects the quality of life in approximately one third of men older than 50 years. BPH is histologically evident in up to 90% of men by age 85 years. As many as 14 million men in the United States have symptoms of BPH. Worldwide, approximately 30 million men have symptoms related to BPH . Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common urological diseases among men . It is characterised by a benign overgrowth of prostatic tissue around the urethra, which ultimately constricts the urethral opening, resulting in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Symptoms associated with LUTS include urgency, frequency, nocturia, incomplete urination, and weak urinary stream . If left untreated, complications such as urinary retention, renal insufficiency and bladder stone can occur, requiring surgical intervention. BPH has also been associated with other medical morbidities, such as increased risk of falls, reduced quality of life  as well as increased annual healthcare cost [61,62].
Together we can see that each of the 3 disease areas we have chosen to look at affect significant percentages of the population and significantly reduce quality of life. The 3 dis-ease areas we have chosen to look at also affect a wide range of adults, 18 + if we look at the therapeutic ladders for each disease we will see that there are many steps both over the counter, self medication / treatment and directed by health care professionals / health care providers.
The Therapeutic Ladder or patient journey mapSymptoms leading to immediate surgery: -Urinary stasis kidney -Bladder stone -Recurrent -Urinary infection -Urinary retention -Prostatic bleeding
Symptoms leading to individual, Step Wise therapy:Urge, nocturia, dribbling, latency, high residual volume A discussion around shortening the therapeutic ladder for the patient as well as the health care provider and healthcare funder should possibly take place as each step incurs a cost to all parties concerned [63*66]. It is reported anecdotally that the millennial would rather enter the therapeutic ladder and have a treatment with a high degree of efficacy and effectiveness despite increased severity of treatment rather than follow the steps up the ladder. One issue reported and found in the original research conducted was that medications could not work fast enough for patients facing social pressures. “Patients want faster response rates . They see a 50% improvement in six months time. They want significant improvement in one month”. Therefore it stands to reason that any opportunity to show faster results would provide significant leverage with patients, healthcare providers and healthcare funders [68-70].
In the case of Acne, from the original research, patients appear less satisfied than dermatologists with the duration of treatment [71-73]. Research also showed patients want timely treatment for painful or / and embarrassing conditions. They don’t want to have to fail a string of medications / treatments before getting what they want or need and require [74-76]. Therefore what patients want is a shortened therapeutic ladder
One research candidate described:“The number of treatments they have to go through is not cost effective. They’re spending thousands on managing relapses and maintenance [77-81]. They suffer psychological stress because they can’t afford it. They end up trying to get treated on compassionate grounds [82-85]. The NHS won’t offer the treatment they want and the instant fix they’re looking for . There is quite high demand, they didn’t understand the expense up front” . There is definite demand for a shortened therapeutic ladder by patients with fewer steps, less chance of relapse and an overall faster time to being asymptomatic and the relief of symptoms, which will alleviate the social and mental health pressures as well as the effects and physical disabilities of disease [88-94].
Patients, Clinicians. Healthcare Providers and funders want a shortened therapeutic ladder or stepwise therapy which will save healthcare costs in both time and treatments and be beneficial to the patient and probably help the wider economy with a healthier population [95-100].
Further research is needed into the wider healthcare economics of changing the way we address the therapeutic ladder [101-111].
Further research is needed into the wider healthcare economics of changing the way we address the therapeutic ladder.
Shortening the patient pathway may give great benefits to healthcare systems especially as these systems and providers are under greater pressure to treat more patients with fewer resources, so therefore shortening the therapeutic ladder to fewer steps, so therefore patient visits and interactions, may free up valuable resources that are in short supply whilst giving the patient the most efficacious treatment first time, every time.
Healthcare funders may also benefit from cost savings in visits and tried and failed therapies by adopting a shorter therapeutic ladder and moving to the state of the art and the most efficacious treatment with a higher percentage success rate in a shortened patient pathway
The wider economy could also benefit with greater taxation, both direct and in-direct and lower costs in a socialised healthcare system, from a healthier population, quicker, through the adoption of a short therapeutic ladder
Anecdotally the millennial would rather enter the therapeutic ladder and have a treatment with a high degree of efficacy and effectiveness despite increased severity of treatment.
We must not forget that patients see each visit, even for diagnostic tests and check-ups as a procedural visit to the healthcare provider and so if one adds up all the steps of the therapeutic ladder for a specific patient and adds all the visits for diagnostic tests, pre-theatre workup and check-ups the number of visit and consultations can be quite high. Increasingly in areas such as oncology the number of visits is being reduced with a back-to-back, same visit, service and this can be extended to all areas of healthcare.
Patients overall short term and long-term health outcomes would be improved by a shortened therapeutic ladder and short treatment cycle, fewer prescription charges along with improvements to their quality of life and mental health.
With further healthcare economics and Value Based Health Care research a shortened therapeutic ladder can be validated for efficiency for the healthcare provider, healthcare funder and the patient
1. The world Health Organization pain ladder bases therapeutic choices on pain intensity and makes no provision of neuropathic or mixed pain syndromes. Notes: *In fixed-dose combination products, such as oxycodone and paracetamol or hydrocodone and paracetamol; **considered a step 2 opioid but is also available in fixed-dose combination product of tramadol and paracetamol. Adapted from world Health Organization pain ladder. 127
2. Brien JO, Pergolizzi J, van de Laar, Raffa RB (2012) Pain Treatment in Arthritis-Related Pain: Beyond NSAIDs. 6: 320-330.
4. Krieg T, Bickers DR, Miyachi Y (2010) Therapy of Skin Diseases: A Worldwide Perspective on Therapeutic Approaches
5. Xu S, Zhu Y, Hu H, Liu X, Li L, et al. (2021) The analysis of acne increasing suicide risk Monitoring Editor: Sara Mohamed Medicine (Baltimor) 100: 26035.
6. Tan JKL, Bhate K (2015) British Journal of Dermatology A global perspective on the epidemiology of acne.
7. Cordain L, Lindeberg S, Hurtado M, Hill K, Eaton SB, et al. (2002) Acne VulgarisA Disease of Western Civilization Arch Dermatol 138: 1584-1590.
8. Kessler A, Sollie S, Challacombe B, Briggs K, Hemelrijck MV (2019) The global prevalence of erectile dysfunction: a review
9. Ahmed A, Alnaama A, Shams K , Sale M (2011) Prevalence and risk factors of erectile dysfunction among patients attending primary health care centres in Qatar.
11. Lee SWH , Ching Chan EM , Lai YK (2017) The global burden of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Scientific Reports 7: 7984.
12. Collier CN, Harper JC, Cafardi JA, Cantrell WC, Wang W, et al. (2008) The prevalence of acne in adults 20 years and older. J Am Acad Dermatol 58: 56-59.
13. Halvorsen JA, Stern RS, Dalgard F, Thoresen M, Bjertness E, et al. (2011)Suicidal ideation, mental health problems, and social impairment are increased in adolescents with acne: a population-based study. J Invest Dermatol 131: 363-370
14. Peck GL, Olsen TG, Butkus D, Pandya M, Arnaud-Battandier J, et al. (1982) Isotretinoin versus placebo in the treatment of cystic acne. A randomized double-blind study. J Am Acad Dermatol 6: 735-745.
15. Bremner JD, Shearer KD, McCaffery PJ (2012) Retinoic acid and affective disorders: the evidence for an association. J Clin Psychiatry 73: 37-50.
16. Jick SS, Kremers HM, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C (2000) Isotretinoin use and risk of depression, psychotic symptoms, suicide, and attempted suicide. Arch Dermatol 136: 1231-1236.
17. Jacobs DG, Deutsch NL, Brewer M (2001) Suicide, depression, and isotretinoin: is there a causal link? J Am Acad Dermatol 45: 168-75.
18. Zhu Y, Zhang H, Shi S, Gao J, Lia Yet al. (2013) Suicidal risk factors of recurrent major depression in Han Chinese women. PLoS one 8: 80030.
19. Lee S, Fung SC, Tsang A, Liu ZR, Y Q Huang YQ, et al. (2007) Lifetime prevalence of suicide ideation, plan, and attempt in metropolitan China. Acta Psychiatr Scand 116: 429-437.
20. Kao YC, Liu YP, Cheng TH, Chou MK (2012) Subjective quality of life and suicidal behavior among Taiwanese schizophrenia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 47: 523-532.
21. Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, et al. (2008) Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry 192: 98-105.
22. Dong M, Wang SB, Li Y, Dan Xu D, Ungvari GS et al. (2018) Prevalence of suicidal behaviors in patients with major depressive disorder in China: A comprehensive meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 225: 32-39.
24. Cotterill JA, Cunliffe WJ (1997) Suicide in dermatological patients. Br J Dermatol 137: 246-250.
25. Gupta MA, Gupta AK (1998) Depression and suicidal ideation in dermatology patients with acne, alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 139: 846-850.
26. Picardi A, Mazzotti E, Pasquini P (2006) Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation among patients with skin disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 54: 420-426.
28. Gupta MA, Pur DR, Vujcic B, Gupta AK (2017) Suicidal behaviors in the dermatology patient. Clin Dermatol 35: 302-311.
29. Wells G, Shea B, O’connell D, Robertson J, J. Peterson JV, et al. (2014) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute;
30. Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. ( 2001) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non randomised studies in meta-analyses.
31. Wells G (2014) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non randomised studies in meta-analyses.
32. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Douglas G (2003) Altman Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557-560.
33. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539-1558.
34. Leonard T, Duffy JC (2002) A Bayesian fixed effects analysis of the Mantel–Haenszel model applied to meta-analysis. Stat Med 21: 2295-2312.
35. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA (2006) A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med 25: 3443-3457.
36. Chootrakool H, Shi JQ, Yue R (2011) Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis for multi-arm trials with selection bias. Stat Med 30:1183-1198.
37. Purvis D, Robinson E, Merry S, Watson P (2006) Acne, anxiety, depression and suicide in teenagers: a cross-sectional survey of New Zealand secondary school students. J Paediatr Child Health 42: 793-796.
38. Yang YC, Tu HP, Hong CH, Wei-Chao CW, Chun FH , et al. (2014) Female gender and acne disease are jointly and independently associated with the risk of major depression and suicide: a national population-based study. BioMed Res Int 2014: 504279.
39. Prabhakar D, Peterson EL, Hu Y, Rossom RC, Lynchet FL, et al. (2018) Dermatologic conditions and risk of suicide: a case-control study. Psychosomatics 59: 58-61.
40. Al-Sharifi A, Krynicki CR, Upthegrove R (2015) Self-harm and ethnicity: a systematic review. Int J Soc Psychiatry 61: 600-612.
41. Saitta P, Keehan P, Yousif J, Way BV, Grekin S, et al. (2011) Brancaccio R. An update on the presence of psychiatric comorbidities in acne patients. Part 2: depression, anxiety, and suicide. Cutis 88: 33-40.
42. Saitta P, Keehan P, Yousif J, Way BV, Grekin S, et al. (2011)An update on the presence of psychiatric comorbidities in acne patients. Part 2: depression, anxiety, and suicide. Cutis 88: 92-97.
43. Thomas KH, Martin RM, Potokar J, Pirmohamed M, Gunnell D (2014) Reporting of drug induced depression and fatal and non-fatal suicidal behaviour in the UK from 1998 to 2011. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 15: 54.
44. Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Feldman HA, Derby CA, Kleinman KP, et al. (2000) Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results from the Massachusetts male aging study. J Urol 163: 460-463
45. Abolfotouh MA, Al-Helali NS (2001) Effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life. EMHJ 7: 510-518.
46. Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA (2007) Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. American Journal of Medicine 120: 151-157.
47. Jeremy JY, Ballard SA, Naylor AM, Miller MA, Angelini GD, et al. (1997) Effects of sildenafil, a type-5 cGMP phosphodiasterase inhibitor, and papaverine on cyclic GMP and cyclic AMP levels in the rabbit corpus cavernosum in vitro. Br J Urol 79: 958-963.
48. Grover SA, lka Lowensteyn I, Kaouache M (2007) The prevalence of erectile dysfunction in the primary care setting. Arch Intern Med 166: 213-219.
49. Siu SC, S K Lo, K W Wong, K M Ip, Y S Wong, et al. (2001) Prevalence of and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Hong Kong diabetic patients. Diabet Med 18: 732-738.
50. Bener A, Al-Ansari A, O A A Al-Hamaq A, A Elbagi IE, Afifi M et al. (2007) Prevalence of erectile dysfunction among hypertensive and nonhypertensive Qatari men. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 43: 870–878.
51. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM, et al. (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the international index of erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 11: 319-326.
52. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI (1998) Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Family Practice 15: 519-524.
53. De Almeida Claro J, Grau Kaufmann O, Alarcon G, Aguiar W, Nadozza A, et al. (2006) Could a rural life style decrease the prevalence of erectile dysfunction? BJU International 99: 127-129.
54. Kantor J, Bilker WB, Glasser DB, Margolis DJ et al. (2002) Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and active depression: an analytic cross-sectional study of general medical patients. Am J Epidemiol 156: 1035-1042.
55. May M, Gralla O, Knoll N, Fenske S, Inna Spivak I, et al. (2007) Erectile dysfunction, discrepancy between high prevalence and low utilization of treatment options. BJU International 100:1110-1115.
56. Tan HM, Low WY, Ng CJ, Chen KK, Minoru Sugita M, et al. (2007) Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction (ED) and treatment seeking for ED in Asian Men: the Asian Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study. J Sex Med 4: 1582-1592.
58. Francis ME, Reynolds K, Chen J, Shiuan Chen C, Xigui Wu, et al. (2007) The contribution of common medical conditions and drug exposure to erectile dysfunction in adult males. Am J Epidemiol 178: 591-596.
59. He J, Reynolds K, Chen J, Shiuan Chen C, Wu X, et al. (2007) Cigarette smoking and erectile dysfunction among Chinese men. Am J Epidemiol 166: 803-809.
60. Bacon CG, B Hu F, Giovannucci E, Glasser DB, Mittleman MA, et al. (2002) Association of type and duration of diabetes with erectile dysfunction in a large cohort of men. Diabetes Care 25: 1458-1463.
61. Brookes ST, Link CL, Donovan JL, McKinlay JB, et al. (2008) Relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction: results from the Boston Area Community Health Survey J Urol 179: 250-255.
62. Al-Hunayan A, Al-Mutar M, Kehinde EO, Thalib L, Al-Ghorory M et al. (2007) The prevalence and predictors of erectile dysfunction in men with newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BJU International 99: 130-134.
63. Eardley I, Fisher W, Rosen RC, Niederberger C, Nadel A, et al. (2007) The multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality study: the influence of diabetes on self-reported erectile function, attitudes and treatment-seeking patterns in men with erectile dysfunction. Int J Clin Pract 61: 1446-1453.
64. Rosen RC, Fisher WA, Eardley I, Niederberger C, Nadel A, et al. (2004) The multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study: I. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and related health concerns in the general population. Curr Med Res Opin 20: 607-617.
65. Eardley I, Fisher W, Rosen RC, Niederberger C, Nadel A, et al. (2007) The multinational Men’s Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality study: the influence of diabetes on self-reported erectile function, attitudes and treatment-seeking patterns in men with erectile dysfunction. Int J Clin Pract 61: 1446-1453.
66. John WT, Calhoun E, Jacobsen SJ (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: Benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 173: 1256-1261.
67. McVary, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, et al. (2011) Update on AUA Guideline on the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. The Journal of Urology 185: 1793-1803.
68. Parsons JK, Mougey J, Lambert L, J Wilt T, Fink HA, et al. (2009) Lower urinary tract symptoms increase the risk of falls in older men. Bju International 104: 63-68.
69. Mirone V, Sessa A, Giuliano F, Berges R, Kirby M, et al. (2011) Current benign prostatic hyperplasia treatment: impact on sexual function and management of related sexual adverse events. Int J Clin Pract 65: 1005-1013.
70. Kaplan AL, Agarwal N, Setlur NP, Tan HJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. (2015) Measuring the cost of care in benign prostatic hyperplasia using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Healthcare 3: 43-48.
71. Chute CG, Panser LA, Girman CJ, Oesterling JE, Guess HA, et al. (1993) The prevalence of prostatism: A population-based survey of urinary symptoms. J Urol 150: 85-89.
73. Bushman W Etiology, Epidemiology, and Natural History. Urologic Clinics of North America 36: 403-415.
74. Speakman M, Kirby R, Doyle S, Ioannou C (2015) Burden of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) – focus on the UK. BJU International 115: 508-519,
75. Sommer P, Nielsen KK, Bauer T, Kristensen ES, Hermann GG, Steven K, et al. (1990) Voiding Patterns in Men Evaluated by a Questionnaire Survey. Br J Urol 65: 155-160.
76. Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ (1991) High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet 338: 469-471.
77. McKelvie GB, Collins GN, Hehir M, Rogers ACN (1993) A study of benign prostatic hyperplasia - a challenge to british urology. Br J Urol 71: 38-42.
78. Sagnier PP, MacFarlane G, Richard F, Botto H, Teillac P, et al. (1994) Results of an epidemiological survey using a modified American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia in France. J Urol 151: 1266-1270.
79. Norman RW, Nickel JC, Fish D, Pickett SN (1994) 'Prostate-related symptoms' in Canadian men 50 years of age or older: prevalence and relationships among symptoms. Br J Urol 74: 542-550.
80. Hunter DJ, McKee CM, Black NA, Sanderson CF (1994) Urinary symptoms: prevalence and severity in British men aged 55 and over. J Epidemiol Community Health 48: 569-575.
81. Bosch JL, Hop WC, Kirkels WJ, Schröder FH (1995) Natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia: appropriate case definition and estimation of its prevalence in the community. Urology 46: 34-40.
82. Tsukamoto T, Kumamoto Y, Masumori N, Miyake H, Rhodes T, et al. (1995) Prevalence of prostatism in Japanese men in a community-based study with comparison to a similar American study. J Urol 154: 391-395.
83. Nacey JN, Morum P, Delahunt B (1995) Analysis of the prevalence of voiding symptoms in Maori, Pacific Island, and Caucasian New Zealand men. Urology 46: 506-511.
84. Lee E , Park MS, Shin C, Lee H, Yoo K, et al. (1997) A high-risk group for prostatism: a population-based epidemiological study in Korea. Br J Urol 79: 736-741.
85. Ukimura O, Kojima M, Inui E, Ochiai A, Hata Y, et al. (1996) A statistical study of the American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia in participants of mass screening program for prostatic diseases using transrectal sonography. J Urol 156: 1673-1678.
86. Hunter DJ, Berra-Unamuno A, Martin-Gordo A (1996) Prevalence of urinary symptoms and other urological conditions in Spanish men 50 years old or older. J Urol 155: 1965-1970.
87. Simpson RJ, Fisher W, Lee AJ, Russell E, Garraway M (1996) Benign prostatic hyperplasia in an unselected community-based population: A survey of urinary symptoms, bothersomeness and prostatic enlargement. Br J Urol 77: 186-191.
88. Homma Y, Kawabe K, Tsukamoto T, Yamanaka H, Okada K, et al. (1997) Epidemiologic survey of lower urinary tract symptoms in Asia and Australia using the international prostate symptom score. Int J Urol 4: 40-46.
89. Chicharro-Molero JA, Burgos-Rodriguez R, Sanchez-Cruz JJ, del Rosal-Samaniego JM, Rodero-Carcia P, et al. (1998) Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Spanish men 40 years old or older. J Urol 159: 878-882.
90. Trueman P, Hood SC, Nayak US, Mrazek MF (1999) Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and self-reported diagnosed 'benign prostatic hyperplasia', and their effect on quality of life in a community-based survey of men in the UK. BJU Int 83: 410-415.
91. Blanker MH, Groeneveld FP, Prins A, Bernsen RM, Bohnen AM, et al. (2000) Strong effects of definition and nonresponse bias on prevalence rates of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: the Krimpen study of male urogenital tract problems and general health status. BJU Int 85: 665-671.
92. Teh GC, Sahabudin RM, Lim TC, Chong WL, Woo S, et al. (2001) Prevalence of symptomatic BPE among Malaysian men aged 50 and above attending screening during prostate health awareness campaign. Med J Malaysia 56: 186-195.
93. Berges RR, Pientka L, Höfner K, Senge T, Jonas U (2001) Male lower urinary tract symptoms and related health care seeking in Germany. Eur Urol 39: 682-687.
94. Lee EH, Chun KH, Lee Y (2005) Benign prostatic hyperplasia in community-dwelling elderly in Korea. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi 35: 1508-1513.
95. Roehrborn C Insights into the relationships between prostatic disorders and their potential impact on future urologic practice. European Urology Supplements 5: 698-703.
96. Naslund MJ, Gilsenan AW, Midkiff KD, Bown A, Wolford ET, et al. (2007) Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and prostate enlargement in the primary care setting. Int J clin Pract 61: 1437-1445.
97. Kristal AR, Arnold KB, Schenk JM, Neuhouser ML, Weiss N (2007) Race/ethnicity, obesity, health related behaviors and the risk of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. J Urol 177: 1395-1400.
98. Safarinejad MR (2008) Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a population-based study in Iranian men 40 years old or older. Int Urol Nephrol 40: 921-931.
99. Huh JS, Kim YL, Kim SD (2012) Prevalence of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Jeju Island: Analysis from a Cross-sectional Community-based Survey. World J Mens Health 30: 131-137.
100. Chokkalingam AP, Yeboah ED, DeMarzo A,Netto G, Yu K, et al. (2019) Prevalence of BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms in West Africans. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 15: 170-176.
101. Goh HJ, Kim SA, Nam JW, Choi BY, Moon HS (2015) Community-based research on the benign prostatic hyperplasia prevalence rate in Korean rural area. Korean J Urol 56: 68-75.
102. Arafa MA, Farhat K, Aqdas S, Al-Atawi M, Rabah DM (2015) Assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms in Saudi men using the International Prostate Symptoms Score. Urol Ann 7: 221-225.
103. Egan KB, Suh M, Rosen RC, Burnett AL, Ni X (2015) Rural vs. urban disparities in association with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia in ageing men, NHANES 2001-2008. Int J Clin Pract 69: 1316-1325.
104. Da J, Xu MX, Yao HJ, Ren XM, Zhang K, et al. (2015) Prevalence of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Shanghai, China: A Community-based Study. J Integr Nephrol Androl 2: 128-131.
105. Goh HJ, Kim SA, Nam JW, Choi BY, Moon HS (2015) Community-based research on the benign prostatic hyperplasia prevalence rate in Korean rural area. Korean J Urol 56: 68-75.
106. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee (2003) AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 170: 530-547.
107. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, et al. (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283: 2008-2012.
108. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) 2008) Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.
109. Barry MJ, Fowler Jr FJ, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, et al. (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148: 1549-1557.
110. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.