Is there an Increase in Intra-operative Bleeding during Emergency Hybrid Open-Door Laminoplasty for Post-traumatic Cervical Cord Patients?

Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study Objectives: There are no reports describing the potential increase in intra-operative blood loss with the use of hybrid open-door laminoplasty in post-traumatic cervical cord injuries. Summary of background data: Early surgical intervention for traumatic cervical cord injury has demonstrated outcome benefits but is not without complications. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent opendoor hybrid laminoplasty by a single surgeon was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groupsGroup A: isolated traumatic spinal cord injury without vertebral fracture, Group B: non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Results: 30 consecutive patients, of whom 8 had isolated traumatic cervical injury, underwent hybrid open-door laminoplasty. A longer mean operative time (254 vs 199 minutes, p=0.005), hospital stay (44.1 vs 11.1 days, p=0.006) and ICU or high dependency unit stay (10.3 vs 1.5 days, p=0.004) was noted in the traumatic patients when compared to the non-traumatic patients. A greater amount of intraoperative blood loss was found in the traumatic patients (median 350 ml; range 110-750) and less in the non-traumatic patients (median 130 ml; range 50-400, p=0.032). Patients in both groups showed post-operative neurological recovery with a JOA score improvement of 1.9 ± 3.1 (p=0.14) in the traumatic group and 1.4 ± 1.7 (p=0.001) in the non-traumatic group. Conclusions: Emergency open-door hybrid laminoplasty can be performed in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. While early surgical decompression for post-traumatic patients improves neurological outcomes, a higher intra-operative bleeding should be anticipated in post-traumatic patients. Citation: Liu G*, Lee BH, Tan JYW, Ng JH, Tan JH. Is there an Increase in Intra-operative Bleeding during Emergency Hybrid Open-Door Laminoplasty for Posttraumatic Cervical Cord Patients? J Orthopedics Rheumatol. 2021; 8(1): 5. J Orthopedics Rheumatol 8(1): 5 (2021) Page 02 ISSN: 2334-2846 is a modified muscle-sparing technique of the traditional open-door laminoplasty [13]. The hybrid open-door laminoplasty technique incorporates a C4-6 open-door laminoplasty with instrumentation to reduce laminar door closure, a C3 dome-like osteotomy, and an upper C7 partial laminectomy (Figure 1,2). This technique preserves the semispinalis cervicis muscle attachments at the C2 level and the trapezium muscle attachments at C7, to reduce the incidence of postoperative axial neck pain and cervical kyphosis [14-17]. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 24.0 (IBM Corp, 2016). Pearson’s chi-squared analysis and independent t-tests were used to compare the demographic variables and outcome variables between both groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant in our study.


ISSN: 2334-2846
is a modified muscle-sparing technique of the traditional open-door laminoplasty [13]. The hybrid open-door laminoplasty technique incorporates a C4-6 open-door laminoplasty with instrumentation to reduce laminar door closure, a C3 dome-like osteotomy, and an upper C7 partial laminectomy (Figure 1,2). This technique preserves the semispinalis cervicis muscle attachments at the C2 level and the trapezium muscle attachments at C7, to reduce the incidence of postoperative axial neck pain and cervical kyphosis [14][15][16][17].
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 24.0 (IBM Corp, 2016). Pearson's chi-squared analysis and independent t-tests were used to compare the demographic variables and outcome variables between both groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant in our study.

Results
A total of 30 patients were analyzed in the study. Group A (traumatic) included 8 male patients with a mean age of 62.6 (52-76) years. Group B (non-traumatic) included 22 patients, of which 12 were male and 10 were females, with an average age of 62. 5 (45-73) years. An average of 5.1 (range 5-6) cervical segments were operated on. There were no significant statistical differences between the two groups in terms of age and number of vertebral segments operated except for gender (p=0.03). A summary of the patient demographics can be found in Table 1.
In traumatic group A, there were 4 patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment scale A, 1 patient with ASIA C, and 3 patients with ASIA D. The mean pre-operative JOA score of the traumatic group was 6.9 ± 4.6. In non-traumatic group B, 20 patients had cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 2 patients had ossification of a posterior longitudinal ligament. The mean JOA score of non-traumatic Group B was 13.1 ± 2.0. For traumatic surgery, the median time delay to operation was 3 days (range 0-20). There was significantly longer mean operative time (255 vs 199 minutes, p=0.023), mean hospital stay (44.1 vs 11.1 days, p=0.003) and mean ICU or high dependency unit stay (10.3 vs 1.5 days, p=0.002) noted in the traumatic group when compared to the non-traumatic group.
A significantly greater amount of blood loss was noted in the traumatic group (median 400 ml; range 110-1000) when compared to the non-traumatic group (median 140 ml; range 50-1500, p=0.014). Excluding the two outliers (Table 2), a similar result is observed with a greater amount of blood loss found in the traumatic group (median 350 ml; range 110-750) as compared to the non-traumatic group (median 130 ml; range 50-400, p=0.015). None of the patients required post-operative blood transfusion Although a poorer pre-operative JOA score was noted in the traumatic group when compared to the non-traumatic group (6.9 vs 13.1, p<0.001), both groups showed neurological improvement postoperatively. While there was a trend towards an improvement in postoperative JOA score, only the non-traumatic group had a statistically significant JOA score improvement. The mean JOA score improvement was 1.4 ± 1.7 (p=0.001) in the non-traumatic group and 1.9 ± 3.1 (p=0.62) in the traumatic group (Table 3).
Post-operatively, in the traumatic group, 1 pre-operative tetraplegic (ASIA A) patient died on post-operative day 7 from respiratory complications. There was also 1 case of superficial wound infection, which resolved after a course of oral antibiotics. In the nontraumatic group B, there was 1 case of superficial wound infection which resolved with oral antibiotics. A summary of the post-operative complications is found in Table 4.

Discussion
The benefits of early surgical decompression in post-traumatic spinal cord injury patients are well documented in the literature [7][8][9][10][11]. A meta-analysis of 9 articles by Liu et al. showed that urgent surgical decompression within 24 hours improved the neurological outcome when compared to late surgery [18]. However, emergent and early surgical decompression of this traumatized cervical cord are not without complications. A retrospective study of 1060 patients by Samuel et al. showed that waiting to optimize the general health of the patient before proceeding with surgical decompression is

Post-op Complications
• 1 preoperative ASIA A patient died on POD 8 from pneumonia • 2 urinary tract infections associated with decreased mortality and may be more beneficial [19]. may be explained by the hyperemic surgical field seen in posttraumatic patients. Kobrine et al. reported that there was an increased blood flow in the spinal cord of monkeys after traumatic cervical cord injury. This was postulated to be secondary to a combination ISSN: 2334-2846 incidence of acute coronary events [22]. These studies highlighted the volatility of the vascular status in post-traumatic cervical cord patients and their greater risk of intraoperative bleeding. Increased intra-operative bleeding increases post-operative morbidity, disease burden, and demands more post-operative resources to manage the post-traumatic cervical spine patients [12,[23][24][25][26][27]. Hu et al, in a review article of spinal deformity surgery, conceptualized that significant blood loss can result in greater fluid shifts which affect cardiac function, increase coagulopathy, postoperative hematoma formation with potential neurologic compromise, and increases the risk of postoperative spinal infection [23]. Similarly, Yu et al reported that excessive blood loss in cervical spine surgery leads to complications including Greuters et al. noted a high prevalence of coagulopathy in post-traumatic brain injury patients [21] while Yang et al. found that patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries have a greater incidence of acute coronary events [22]. These studies highlighted the volatility of the vascular status in post-traumatic cervical cord patients and their greater risk of intraoperative bleeding.
Increased intra-operative bleeding increases postoperative morbidity, disease burden, and demands more post-operative resources to manage the post-traumatic cervical spine patients [12,[23][24][25][26][27]. Hu et al, in a review article of spinal deformity surgery, conceptualized that significant blood loss can result in greater fluid shifts which affect cardiac function, increase coagulopathy, postoperative hematoma formation with potential neurologic compromise, and increase the risk of postoperative spinal infection [23]. Similarly, Yu et al reported that excessive blood loss in cervical spine surgery leads to complications including postoperative anemia, hypotension, hematoma formation, and inadequate oxygenation of organs, and resulted in poor postoperative patient outcomes [24]. Other authors reported that increased intraoperative blood loss was associated with specific postoperative cervical spine complications. Fineberg et al found that acute posthemorrhagic anemia from surgical blood loss was a risk factor for perioperative cardiac events in cervical spine surgery [25]. Awad et al reported that excessive blood loss of more than 1litres was a significant risk factor for postoperative epidural hematoma formation [12] whereas Sagi et al found that blood loss of greater than 300ml was predictive of airway complications and re-endotracheal tube intubation post anterior cervical spine surgery [27]. In our study, increased intraoperative blood loss may be related to increased operative time and postoperative hospital stay. This may be due to poor surgical field visualization and subsequent increased time required to arrest the aggressive intraoperative epidural bleeding [28]. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study to compare intra-operative blood loss in emergent versus elective hybrid open-door laminoplasty. One of the limitations to this study is the small patient sample size. Nonetheless, this study demonstrates the possibility of increased intraoperative bleeding during emergency hybrid open-door laminoplasty in the current trend of emergent surgical decompression of traumatic cervical cord injury patients. Should emergent posterior laminoplasty technique be employed, we would recommend the potential use of additional surgical maneuvers to reduce intraoperative blood loss. These include the use of tranexamic acid [28,29], cell saver [30], or the use of French door laminoplasty [31] to avoid epidural bleeding from the open door laminoplasty gutter [32,33].

Conclusion
The current study suggests that hybrid open-door laminoplasty can be performed in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. While early surgical decompression for post-traumatic patients improves neurological outcomes, higher intra-operative bleeding should be anticipated in post-traumatic patients.